Government Contract Claims and Dispute Lawyers

Are you a government contractor struggling with a contract dispute or claim?

government contract claims and disputes lawyers washington DC

Our team of government contract dispute lawyers specialize in helping small business government contractors and large defense contractors navigate the complex world of government contract disputes and claims. We understand the unique challenges you face and are here to help you resolve any issues quickly and effectively.

Don’t let a contract dispute or claim derail your business. With our assistance, you can protect your company’s reputation and bottom line. Our extensive knowledge and experience of government contractor claim regulations make us the go-to resource for resolving contract disputes and claims.

Contact us today to schedule a consultation and get the help you need to resolve your government contract dispute or claim. Call 1.866.601.5518.

When engaging in business with the government, claims and disputes can quickly arise and lead to costly legal mistakes. Knowing how to navigate and manage these disputes is key for both businesses and individuals. In this article, we will discuss government contract claims, the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, appealing a contracting officer’s final decision, and tips for hiring a qualified government contract appellate lawyer. We will also look at recent court decisions that have shaped the law in this area.

How Watson & Associates, LLC Federal Contract Disputes Lawyers Can Help You?

When dealing with a government contract dispute, the process can be complicated and the stakes are high. Watson & Associates, LLC Federal contractor dispute lawyers understand how difficult it can be to navigate these disputes. Our team of experienced claims and dispute attorneys will help you throughout the process, from preparing you to file the administrative claim to appealing a contracting officer’s final decision.

Our attorneys are well-versed in the nuances of government contracts and know how to assess cases for potential success. We have successfully represented clients in numerous contract disputes, from claims involving the Veteran’s Administration (VA), and Department of Defense to the various military branches. Our contract dispute lawyers have also successfully argued cases before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, the Court of Federal Claims, and other tribunals.

See Tips On How to File a Contract Disputes Act Claim

What is The Contract Disputes Act of 1978?

The United States Congress enacted the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) in 1978 to provide a framework for resolving disputes between contractors and the government. The CDA outlines how claims should be handled and resolved, as well as provides remedies for parties that are not satisfied with how their claim has been handled at the agency level.

This is where most contractors make costly mistakes: The Contract Disputes Act and its application to preparing and submitting contract claims against the government is where most contractors make huge mistakes. At Watson & Associates, LLC our team of experienced procurement lawyers specializes in guiding clients through the intricate landscape of the Contract Disputes Act. With their deep understanding of government contracting regulations and their expertise in dispute resolution, our lawyers provide invaluable assistance to clients facing contract disputes with government agencies.

They meticulously analyze the contractual provisions, evaluate the merits of the claim, and help clients gather the necessary documentation to support their case. Our lawyers are well-versed in the procedural requirements and strict deadlines of the Contract Disputes Act, ensuring that clients’ claims are filed correctly and in a timely manner.

They skillfully negotiate with the government agency, striving to achieve favorable settlements and resolutions for our clients. In cases where litigation becomes necessary, our procurement lawyers vigorously advocate for our clients’ interests in court.

Through their comprehensive knowledge and strategic approach, our lawyers effectively navigate the complexities of the Contract Disputes Act, providing clients with the guidance and representation they need to protect their rights and achieve successful outcomes in contract disputes with the government.

What Types of Claims Does the Contract Disputes Act Cover?

The Contract Disputes Act (CDA) covers a wide range of claims that may arise in government contracting. Here are some of the types of claims that are subject to the CDA:

  1. Breach of contract: Claims alleging that the government has breached the terms and conditions of a contract, such as failure to make payments, failure to perform obligations, or failure to deliver goods or services as specified.
  2. Termination for convenience: Claims arising from the government’s decision to terminate a contract for its convenience. This includes claims for costs incurred due to termination, such as demobilization expenses or unamortized startup costs.
  3. Changes to the contract: Claims resulting from changes made to the contract, including changes in scope, specifications, or delivery schedules that impact the cost or performance of the contract.
  4. Delay and disruption: Claims related to delays caused by the government, such as excessive administrative processing time, changes in requirements, or other factors beyond the contractor’s control that result in increased costs or project delays.
  5. Defective specifications: Claims asserting that the government provided faulty or inadequate specifications or drawings, leading to increased costs or difficulties in contract performance.
  6. Cost overruns and equitable adjustments: Claims seeking additional compensation or adjustments to contract prices due to unforeseen or changed circumstances that increase the contractor’s costs, such as inflation, unforeseen site conditions, or changes in regulations.
  7. Payment disputes: Claims arising from disagreements over the amount or timing of payments made by the government, including disputes regarding progress payments, retainage, or final payments.

It’s important to note that the CDA applies to contracts with the federal government in the United States. Different countries may have their own regulations and procedures for handling contract disputes with government entities. Additionally, the specific requirements and procedures for filing claims under the CDA may vary, so it’s advisable to consult with legal counsel familiar with government contract law to navigate the claim process effectively.

What are Common Mistakes Made When Submitting a Contract Disputes Act Claim?

When filing a Contract Disputes Act (CDA) claim, contractors may inadvertently make certain mistakes that can negatively impact the outcome of their claim. Here are some common errors to avoid:

  1. Failure to adhere to notice requirements: The CDA has specific notice requirements, including deadlines for providing written notice of the claim to the contracting officer. Contractors may miss these deadlines or fail to provide the required information in the notice, which can lead to the claim being dismissed.
  2. Inadequate documentation: Contractors must maintain thorough and well-organized documentation to support their claim. This includes contracts, amendments, correspondence, invoices, receipts, and any other relevant records. Insufficient or disorganized documentation can weaken the contractor’s case and make it harder to substantiate the claim.
  3. Lack of specificity and clarity: When preparing the claim, it’s crucial to be specific and clear in describing the basis of the claim, the damages suffered, and how the government’s actions or inactions led to those damages. Vague or ambiguous claims may be difficult to evaluate, resulting in delays or a less favorable outcome.
  4. Failing to quantify damages: Contractors need to provide a detailed calculation of the damages suffered, including supporting documentation and explanations for the costs claimed. Failing to quantify damages or providing inaccurate or unsupported calculations can undermine the credibility of the claim.
  5. Inadequate legal analysis: Contractors should ensure that their claim is supported by a solid legal basis. This requires a thorough understanding of the relevant contract provisions, regulations, and applicable case law. Inaccurate or incomplete legal analysis can weaken the claim’s validity.
  6. Lack of proactive communication: Contractors should maintain open and proactive communication with the contracting officer throughout the claim process. Failure to engage in constructive discussions, provide requested information promptly, or address concerns raised by the government can hinder the resolution of the dispute.
  7. Not seeking legal counsel when needed: Complex contract disputes may require the expertise of procurement lawyers who specialize in government contracts. Failing to seek legal counsel when necessary can result in missed opportunities, inadequate legal arguments, or misunderstandings of the legal requirements.

To maximize the chances of a successful claim, contractors should carefully review the requirements of the CDA, maintain meticulous documentation, seek legal advice if needed, and adhere to all applicable procedures and deadlines. Doing so can help avoid common mistakes and improve the overall effectiveness of the claim process.

Government Contract Claims – The Basics

Government contracts are subject to various rules and regulations, which can lead to disputes between the contracting parties. The Contract Disputes Act of 1978 (CDA) provides an administrative process for resolving contract disputes without resorting to litigation. It applies to all contracts for the procurement of goods and services between the federal government and any private entity. Under the CDA, a party can file a claim for money or other relief against the government. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute informally, either party may submit a written request for a decision by the contracting officer. The contracting officer must then issue a final decision with respect to the claim within 60 days.

How to Prepare a Contract Disputes Act Claim?

When seeking relief from the Contract Disputes Act, it is essential to ensure that a viable claim is submitted. To prepare an effective CDA claim, consider the following:

Filing a claim on a government contract can be a complex process, but I can provide you with a general overview of the steps involved. It’s important to note that the specific procedures and requirements may vary depending on the country and the government agency involved. However, here are some general steps you can follow:

  1. Review the contract: Carefully review the terms and conditions of the contract to understand your rights and obligations, including any provisions related to claims, disputes, and remedies. Pay attention to deadlines and notification requirements for filing a claim.
  2. Gather sufficient documentation: Collect all relevant documents related to the claim, including the contract itself, any modifications or amendments, correspondence, invoices, receipts, and any other evidence supporting your claim. It’s essential to maintain a well-documented paper trail to substantiate your case.
  3. Consult legal counsel: If the claim involves significant amounts of money or complex legal issues, it may be prudent to seek legal advice from an attorney experienced in government contract law. They can guide you through the process and ensure compliance with all applicable regulations.
  4. Notify the contracting officer: In most cases, you should provide written notice of your claim to the contracting officer or the designated representative within a specified timeframe. This notice should clearly state the nature of the claim, the amount involved, and the legal basis for the claim.
  5. Prepare a detailed claim: Prepare a comprehensive written claim that outlines the facts, legal basis, and damages or costs incurred. Be clear, concise, and specific in explaining how the government’s actions or failures have resulted in harm or financial loss to your company.
  6. Submit the claim: Submit the claim to the appropriate government agency contracting officer, following their specific instructions and procedures. Ensure that you meet all deadlines for submitting the claim, as failure to do so may result in the claim being dismissed.
  7. Negotiation and resolution: After the claim is submitted, the government agency will review it and may initiate negotiations to resolve the dispute. This could involve discussions, meetings, or formal mediation sessions. It’s essential to engage in good faith negotiations to reach a fair settlement.
  8. Appeal or litigation: If the negotiation process fails to resolve the dispute satisfactorily, you may have the option to appeal the decision or initiate legal proceedings. Consult with your legal counsel to determine the best course of action based on your specific circumstances.

Remember, the process of filing a claim on a government contract can vary depending on the jurisdiction and agency involved. It’s crucial to familiarize yourself with the specific rules and regulations applicable to your situation. Consider seeking professional legal advice to ensure you navigate the process effectively.

1. Identify and accurately describe the contract terms in dispute.

2. Collect all relevant documents that demonstrate compliance with the contract, including invoices and payment records.

3 . Clearly set out the exact amount of money or other relief requested and the basis for that request.

4. Explain any mitigating circumstances, such as delays or problems encountered in the performance of the contract.

5. Request a contracting officer’s final decision, and

6. Certify the claim if over $100,000.00

Differing Site Condition Claims

Differing site conditions are a common source of contract disputes. The CDA applies to claims arising from differing site conditions, and contractors may file claims for additional costs or time incurred due to unexpected delays or problems encountered on the construction project.

Differing site condition contract claims must be based upon facts that were not reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting and must be supported by substantial evidence. Our government contract claims and disputes attorneys are prepared to help you through this process

Site Delay Claims Against the Government

Delay claims against the government can be complicated and time-consuming. The CDA applies to claims for additional costs or time incurred due to unexpected delays in the performance of a contract. Under the CDA, contractors may file claims for additional costs or time incurred due to excusable delays caused by the government.

The contractor must demonstrate that it was actually delayed, that the delay was caused by the government, and that the delay resulted in additional costs or time beyond what was contemplated under the contract. Our attorneys are experienced in handling these types of cases and have successfully represented clients in numerous delay claim disputes.

Constructive Change Contract Disputes

Constructive change contract disputes occur when the government requests changes to the scope of work under a contract after it has been awarded.

These changes, referred to as constructive changes, are typically not addressed in the original contract and require additional time and resources to complete. The CDA provides a framework for resolving disputes related to constructive changes by requiring the contracting officer to issue a final decision within 60 days.

Contractors have the right to seek relief if they believe that the change was outside of the scope of their original agreement or was made without proper authorization. Contractors can also file claims for additional costs incurred due to these changes. It is important for contractors to consult with an attorney when filing a constructive change claim to ensure that all of their rights are protected.

The Appeal of the Contracting Officer’s Final Decision

If a contracting party is unhappy with the final decision issued by the contracting officer, they can file an appeal. Appeals are heard by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), which hears cases involving disputes pertaining to military contracts. The Board of Contract Appeals and the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) both hear appeals from civilian contract disputes. Contractors can also appeal the decision to the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

Mistakes to Avoid When Submitting Contract Disputes Act Claims to the Federal Government

When submitting claims to the federal government, contractors should also avoid making any of the following mistakes:

1. Filing the claim before all facts have been discovered and documented.

2. Not submitting sufficient evidence to support the claim.

3. Not providing supporting documentation for any costs incurred as a result of the dispute.

4. Not providing a clear explanation of how the contractor was affected by the change or delay in order to establish causation and damages.

5. Failing to file an appeal if dissatisfied with the contracting officer’s final decision in a timely matter

6. Failing to establish the proper legal theories to either show why the contract was breached etc. This is where our government claims lawyers can be beneficial. You cannot raise new issues on appeal. All issues and legal theories MUST be presented to the contracting officer.

Avoid Denials Due to Previous Release of Claims and Accord and Satisfaction

Release of Claims and Accord and Satisfaction (A&S) are two important contractual concepts that can have a decisive impact on the outcome of a government contract dispute. These two processes involve the agreement between parties to release any claims they may have against one another and to settle any disputes that may arise. If either party fails to adhere to this agreement, they risk having their claim denied by the government.


Contractors should always consult with an experienced contract dispute attorney before submitting a claim to the federal government. These claims can be complex and require careful consideration of the applicable law and regulations. Our attorneys have successfully represented clients in numerous government claim disputes, from constructive changes to delay claims. We understand the complexities of the CDA and are here to help you navigate these matters.

For Immediate help, call our government contractor dispute lawyers today at 1.866.601.5518 for a FREE initial Consultation.